James Cameron is a “mad
scientist”—and the director of the two highest grossing films ever made—Titanic and Avatar. Apple Computer
founder and CEO Steve Jobs is a “mad scientist.” So were Ludwig Beethoven, Henry Ford and Amelia
Earhart. Who could deny their gigantic
contributions or their incredible gifts?
We use the label “mad
scientists,” not as a reference to some evil maladjusted type like Dr.
Strangelove, Dr. No, or Frankenstein, but rather as the catch-all phrase for
the gifted eccentric and unconventional wild ducks that occasionally enter
organizations. Some are nerdy, some are
whiz kids without manners, and some are amazing talents marching to their own
drum. For most organizations they bring
mixed blessings.
All “mad scientists” have common noble
traits—brilliant, visionary, perfectionists and passionately driven. They are also very challenging to work with,
extremely bull-headed, egotistical, irreverent and sometimes borderline crazy. Organizations cannot tolerate many “mad
scientists.” They disturb the sanctity
of stability.
“Mad scientists” ask tough questions
that can make mediocre performers feel inadequate. “Mad scientists” ignore tidy rules of
corporate civility in pursuit of their bold visions. They poke around in areas outside their
sandbox and beyond their pay grades. While
most “mad scientists” would get an A+ in creativity, their impatience with
diplomacy nets them an F in “emotional intelligence.”
Some organizations try to expel all
“mad scientists.” Unless these misfits are
protected by being in the top slot—like film director, CEO, or owner--they get
labeled, ignored and ostracized. Instead
of having someone run interference, “mad scientists” are too often
marginalized. Rather than accommodating
their “weirdness” while acclaiming their enormous triumphs, they are asked to
“play nice.” Their performance reviews
give short shrift to their vast achievements while spotlighting only their
“does not play well with others” dimension.
They are told to get a coach or read a book or see a counselor. Failing to be valued for their contribution,
most exit for larger pastures, not just greener ones. Consider the loss to the organizations they
vacate.
Every thriving organization needs
a few “mad scientists.” They can make us better and more vigorous. Sure, they are complex, challenging, and downright
difficult. But, they can springboard us
to greatness. Of course they can make us
wring our hands and shake our head. They
can also insure our advancement and competitiveness. Celebrate “mad scientists.” They are very rare and we need them.